Ronaldo's double betrayal 
MARTIN JOL 

The pleading of Cristiano Ronaldo for the referee to take action against his 
clubmate Wayne Rooney was not surprising, but it was a disgrace for football 

Did England really play well enough during this tournament to deserve to be in 
a World Cup semi-final? Only the most one-eyed England fans could put their 
hands on their hearts and, without the slightest doubt, say yes. But that 
doesn't alter the fact that yesterday, after giving their best performance 
since arriving in Germany, England went out of the competition with pride. To 
lose in those circumstances was a disgrace. And the biggest disgrace of all was 
Cristiano Ronaldo. 
The key incident in the game was Wayne Rooney's sending-off. It wasn't even a 
booking. I watched the match in Holland with a hundred football-mad Dutchmen. 
Everybody was cheering for England and everybody felt the same. 

When Rooney trampled on Ricardo Carvalho, he didn't do it on purpose. Before 
that he was being impeded and should have had a foul anyway. The referee blew 
his whistle and paused and was thinking of what to do when Ronaldo ran over and 
asked him to show a card. It's how Ronaldo always behaves, trying to influence 
referees, and it turns my stomach when players do that. 

I thought to myself, how could he do that? You could argue that Ronaldo is 
playing for his country in a World Cup, so it's okay to do anything to win. I 
don't believe that. What about sporting values? Rooney is his club teammate, 
and judging by the way they walked out together at the start, joking, his 
friend? It was a double betrayal, a disaster for football. 

I know everybody will be talking about Rooney but I feel sorry for him. He was 
not guilty. It was a sad way for one of the potential stars of the tournament 
to go out of his first World Cup. 

All in all, I felt emotional seeing England lose. In Holland, England are 
always our second team, and we had all the more reason to support them 
yesterday because of the way Portugal played against Holland in the second 
round. Just as Ronaldo pulled that stunt to get Rooney punished, against 
Holland, Luis Figo got Khalid Boulahrouz red-carded for an elbow that never 
was. 

Would England have won with 11 against 11? Impossible to say. The game was very 
even until the sending-off. England were defending well, but, just like in 
every match they played in the tournament, they were unwilling to take the 
initiative. 

After Rooney's red card, they were magnificent. It must have been the best 
defensive performance, with 10 versus 11, seen in the last five years. The task 
suited them. They could forget about possession and concentrate on defence, 
looking for the odd counter- attack, which, under Sven-Göran Eriksson, has 
often been their approach. 

They defended so well that keeping Portugal out almost looked easy, and Aaron 
Lennon made a huge impact when he came on. When Lennon was replaced by Jamie 
Carragher, it seemed a little strange. Obviously it was so Carragher could take 
a penalty. I didn't know he was a penalty specialist. 

If Carragher's successful first attempt had been allowed to stand, the 
substitution would have looked a great decision. But what happened when 
Carragher stepped up the second time suggested he wasn't a specialist after 
all. For what it's worth, Lennon is a good penalty-taker. 

Although Portugal were disgraceful against Holland, and full of gamesmanship 
yesterday, they probably did more in the competition than England to deserve a 
place in the semis. 

Yesterday was the best England played, but even then, they were still playing 
for the result rather than seeking to dominate a game. It was one up front 
again, and though the midfield shape was better, and Owen Hargreaves did very 
well, Joe Cole and Beckham were not high enough up the pitch to give Rooney 
support. 

Once more England's main feature was their wonderful defence. If you 
concentrate on keeping out the opposition rather than creating ways to score, 
you risk 0-0, which, in a World Cup, means extra time and possibly penalties. 
Given England's past record, how safe is it to bet on penalties? I said before 
the tournament England are seen by the rest of the world as major under- 
achievers. And they are going home early again, as they have always done since 
1966. Eriksson was hired to change that sad history. Unfortunately he couldn't 
do it. 

TIMES ONLINE

Thanks & God Bless You
Samuel Rismana S
http://www.formulabisnis.com/id-mu4ever

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
See what's inside the new Yahoo! Groups email.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/2pRQfA/bOaOAA/yQLSAA/2_TolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

HAPUS BAGIAN EMAIL YG TIDAK PERLU SEBELUM ME-REPLY.

==========================================================
Milis Tabloid BOLA
Untuk KELUAR DARI MILIS INI. Kirim Mail kosong (tanpa subject) ke alamat [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
========================================================== 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bolaml/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Kirim email ke