Does that mean you have to save for example changesummary_1 to pages instead of the standard changesummary data field?
Would it be possible to automate the creation of unique field names and hide it from the user? What about numbering them in the order they are used? (It gets quite complex managing so many underscores and numbers.) Regards, Markus On Oct 2, 12:23 am, The Editor <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, each command must have a unique field name. So use > > target > target_1 > target_2 > etc. > > The same with savedata, rename, and/or any other fields. > > Cheers > Dan > > > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Markus <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hey, > > > I am trying to create action.lock to lock the site with a custom > > blocked-message. > > > The current code is: > > > [form] > > The following message will be displayed to non-admins while the site > > is locked: > > [box lockmessage rows=4][box] > > [submit LOCK] > > [session if "exists action.blocked.lock || exists > > site.auth.view.lock ? warn=Could not lock the site. Site already > > locked."] > > [session warn] > > [session author {member}] > > [session changesummary "Page renamed from site.auth.view to > > site.auth.view.lock by {=author}"] > > [session savedata author,changesummary] > > [session rename 'site.auth.view|site.auth.view.lock'] > > [session content '*: @admin > > action.blocked: @guest > > action.login: @guest'] > > [session target site.auth.view] > > [session boltedit '{=content}'] > > [session author {member}] > > [session changesummary "Page created by {=author}."] > > [session savedata author,changesummary] > > [session changesummary "Page renamed from action.blocked to > > action.blocked.lock by {=author}"] > > [session savedata author,changesummary] > > [session rename 'action.blocked|action.blocked.lock'] > > [session target action.blocked] > > [session boltedit '{=lockmessage}'] > > [session changesummary "Page created by {=author}."] > > [session savedata author,changesummary] > > [session nextpage action.lock] > > [form] > > > The code does only work for action.blocked OR site.auth.view. As soon > > as I try to process both only the latter is processed. If I remove the > > code for either one of the files, the action works as intended (but of > > course only for the appropriate file). > > > Ideas? > > > Regards, Markus --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BoltWire" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/boltwire?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
