I think using info-mining is just as fast or faster than a database--and easier to use, but it is a very specific, single-focus solution. If you are going to be treating multiple data values on lots of files and retrieving/reporting that data in multiple ways, maintaining multiple info lists would be onerous. On the other hand if you just need this one functionality, I'd definitely go with a single, simple flat file. Your speed will be plenty impressive.
As for synching--if you use the info file solution, you probably have no need for the local data variable. Just use the info value fully, once you have it mined. Cheers, Dan On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 7:05 AM, Martin <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thank you both for your rapid input. > > I will check the info solution first but I definitely have an eye on > your mysql plugin, DrunkenMonk. I am happy that we have the choice now > - flat file or database. > > Thanks a lot. > Greetings, Martin > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BoltWire" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/boltwire?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
