DM, can you specify which link and/or script you want me to delete. I'll be happy to take care of it for you.
Cheers Dan On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 6:55 PM, DrunkenMonk <[email protected]> wrote: > I thought I had OH! > > There are 2 mysql plugins. One truies to work as a backend, the other > lets you access databases. The backend plugin should be removed since > it's difficult to work in a databases strengths into the way boltwire > is organised. The other plugin is working fine. I use it for > everything, really. > > On Jan 5, 11:38 pm, The Editor <[email protected]> wrote: >> Maybe DrunkenMonk is just being a bit modest. Last I heard it was >> working fine for him. I haven't tried it personally. >> >> Cheers, >> Dan >> >> P.S. Sorry for the lag in your post getting through. I didn't notice >> it until today. To help fight spam on the mailing list, all members >> get their first post moderated. From then on it should go straight >> through. >> >> On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 11:21 AM, roottoor <[email protected]> wrote: >> > I'm confised DrukenMonkey... the boltwire extension page says the db >> > plugin is only experimental and not properly working. Has this been >> > resolved and just not updated on boltwire.com? >> >> > On Dec 30, 4:18 pm, DrunkenMonk <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Deploying a flat-file wiki is much simpler. The self contained >> >> structure is something of a blessing on the multi-purpose servers I >> >> use Boltwire on, where the file system and databases are otherwise >> >> quite easily cluttered. >> >> >> Since Boltwire has a perfectly usable mysql plugin if one has database- >> >> friendly information to store, I really don't see any problems with >> >> the setup. Bearing in mind, of course, that exceptionally large sites >> >> may slow down with a flat-file backend. Most wikis, however, are >> >> simply not that large. >> >> >> On Dec 30, 5:48 pm, Erlend Sogge Heggen <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> > So I searched around a bit more and realized that 'flat files' appears >> >> > to be the term I'm looking for for 'db-free' systems. I found a couple >> >> > half-decent debates and comparisons on the topic, but none of them put >> >> > the argument in the context of online wikis, which is what I hope to >> >> > see in stronger light here. >> >> >> >http://www.databasedev.co.uk/flatfile-vs-rdbms.htmlhttp://www.pmwiki....... >> >> >> > What have you got? ;) >> >> >> > On Dec 30, 5:26 pm, Erlend Sogge Heggen <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> > > I would like to raise awareness to the fact that BoltWire is a >> >> > > database-free system. Developers I've talked to about BoltWire usually >> >> > > considers it a downside. Frankly, it's one of the reasons my project >> >> > > is moving away from DokuWiki as well, because it is not quite as >> >> > > manageable. >> >> >> > > Once upon a time it was the simpler install, but these days even most >> >> > > free hosts come with free sql access. >> >> >> > > What can be said in defense of a db-free system? >> >> > -- >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> > "BoltWire" group. >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > [email protected]. >> > For more options, visit this group >> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/boltwire?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "BoltWire" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/boltwire?hl=en. > > > >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BoltWire" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/boltwire?hl=en.
