Besides, I thought that we discarded the '<' encoding for security purposes. And I supported it.
Now, I discover in v.3.11 that BW encodes it. And it prevents me to write more complex html in my pages, which in the BW API would be too hard. Is it some bug still in the system or it is deliberately so? On 24 Апр, 22:23, Bogdan <[email protected]> wrote: > I need to use iframe in my page, but seemingly BW doesn't recognize it > and renders the text like this: > > <iframe id="gazeta" width="100%" height="500"><br /> > <p >Some text</p><br /> > <p></iframe></p> > > Do I need to add support for it in the markups file? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "BoltWire" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/boltwire?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BoltWire" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/boltwire?hl=en.
