[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Daniel Jensen) writes: > Daniel Brockman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Daniel Jensen) writes: >> >>> Daniel Brockman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> >>>> I'm not entirely opposed to the idea, but maybe `r' should >>>> follow the same "process/prefix convention" as `k', `c', et al.? >>> >>> I guess it could, but then I also think I'd want to use `r' >>> on a single line even when there are marked tracks around. >> >> You could always do `1 r' or `C-SPC C-SPC n r'... > > Well, sure, there's always a way around things. But my idea was that, > like `RET', `r' is something that should not operate on marked tracks. > Obviously, it's up for debate, but I don't have much more to say about > this. You go ahead with whatever you think is best.
I'm ambivalent. I can imagine situations in which I would like to use `r' on the marked tracks. For example, I might go through a buffer to mark all misspelled tracks, and then, --- when I'm done with that ---, turn to correct them all. But then again, of course, I could use `M-&' in that situation. However, I don't think the prompt to rename another file would be very annoying if you only wanted to rename the first one: Hitting `C-g' at the second prompt would keep the first change and escape the other prompts --- right? What about a third opinion? Can we get one? >>> The nice thing about `M-&' is that users can use it for >>> things that we never thought of. Every Bongo command will >>> have support for marks, in a way. >> >> I suppose that's true. But let's at least try to think >> about which commands should have support for marks. > > I can't think of anything now. > > I think we have a good set of commands for marks. > Adding more stuff in the future is easy. I'm happy to hear that. I think so too. > Now, if only more people would test this ... Yes, I too would like to see that happen. >> Then of course there are probably other, non-Bongo-specific >> commands which we won't ever think of, --- as you say, --- >> but which some users may eventually want to use with `M-&'. > > Yes! I want to use `M-& C-x e'. Wow... what a prospect! Okay, then --- we totally need this feature. :-) -- Daniel Brockman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ bongo-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bongo-devel
