Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Daniel Brockman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Hmm, yes, that could be useful. But binding it to `l' might >> be a little dangerous. What if you hit it by accident? > > Good point. > >> How do you use the flush command, by the way? > > I usually have only one playlist and I almost always clear it > completely. But that's probably because I like to play whole > albums, so I enqueue/flush each album one after the other. > > I don't really work with single tracks most of the time.
Okay. That usage is probably very common. I also tend to enqueue and play whole albums at a time. By the way, I think `RET' on a section header really should play (or enqueue-play) that section instead of collapsing it. Though the undoability of collapsing makes it a good candidate for such an easy-to-hit key as `RET', the fact that the same key on a track means `play' makes it a poor choice. I often hit `RET' on an album header with the intention of playing the whole album. So `RET' does not DWIM despite being bound to the command `bongo-dwim'. But I might be biased because I rarely collapse anything, so perhaps it should be a user option. What are your preferences regarding this? >> We talked about extending the queue commands before this >> mailing list was created. Do you remember? > > Yes, but that was in the context of intra-playlist > queuing, I think? Right. I'm thinking we might as well implement some reasonable behavior when using `d' in library buffers, since there is a close correspondence between playlist buffers and intra-playlist queues (they are both queues). -- Daniel Brockman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ bongo-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bongo-devel
