[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406940#comment-13406940
]
Uma Maheswara Rao G commented on BOOKKEEPER-247:
------------------------------------------------
One more case here, the above proposal may break that. For example if the
ledger is really empty, it just created the ledger. then also, there will be
one ensemble created i guess then, above incrementing will give unnecessary
assumption that ledger freagment is in underReplicated.
Any alternatives?
> Detection of under replication
> ------------------------------
>
> Key: BOOKKEEPER-247
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-247
> Project: Bookkeeper
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: bookkeeper-client, bookkeeper-server
> Reporter: Ivan Kelly
> Assignee: Ivan Kelly
> Attachments: BOOKKEEPER-247.diff, BOOKKEEPER-247.diff,
> BOOKKEEPER-247.patch, BOOKKEEPER-247.patch
>
>
> This JIRA discusses how the bookkeeper system will detect underreplication of
> ledger entries.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
