[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13446077#comment-13446077
]
Ivan Kelly commented on BOOKKEEPER-325:
---------------------------------------
Actually, deferred ledgers need to have a different code path for replication,
which needs to
# open the ledger without recovery
# check if the last segment needs to be rereplicated & and is unclosed
# if no, rereplicate as normal
# if yes, reopen with recovery, then rereplicate as normal
> Delay the replication of a ledger if RW found that its last fragment is in
> underReplication.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BOOKKEEPER-325
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-325
> Project: Bookkeeper
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: bookkeeper-auto-recovery
> Affects Versions: 4.2.0
> Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G
> Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G
> Attachments: BOOKKEEPER-325.patch
>
>
> When RW found that ledger's last fragment is in underReplication state, then
> we should delay that ledger replication for some grace period. optimally we
> can replicate other fragments.
> The idea is, Whenever it finds the last fragement is under replicated, It can
> add into PendingReplication list.
> There will be a small daemon, which will check for the timeouts of this
> ledgers.
> Once it timed out , it will trigger the normal replication process if it is
> not in last fragment. Otherwise, it will fence the ledger and will trigger
> the replication nomally.
> see the discussion for more info:
> http://markmail.org/message/ruhhxxgvuqnjlu2s#query:+page:1+mid:f6ifo4sizulwiaem+state:results
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
