[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13454100#comment-13454100
]
Aniruddha commented on BOOKKEEPER-400:
--------------------------------------
Are you sure that those two functions are called from different threads? I
thought that all operations for a ledger are executed by the same thread.
> Ledger entry not found in any of the bookies in the ensemble responsible for
> that entry.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BOOKKEEPER-400
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-400
> Project: Bookkeeper
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: bookkeeper-client
> Reporter: Aniruddha
> Attachments: clean.log.gz
>
>
> Detailed discussion at
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/zookeeper-bookkeeper-dev/201209.mbox/%3cCAOLhyDQzrmeOHmTxzPikeAqJ7pZUn0=vHfd=gc1srmtuye5...@mail.gmail.com%3e
> We had an internal discussion about this. From BOOKKEEPER-337, it seems that
> handleBookieFailure could be invoked in parallel by a thread other the one
> that calls LedgerHandle#sendAddSuccessCallbacks. The values updated by
> handleBookieFailure might not be visible to the thread running
> sendAddSuccessCallbacks because the fields are not volatile and this might
> have caused our bad state.
> BK-337 synchronizes access to metadata.addEnsemble() and we believe this
> would make this scenario very improbable.
> A long term fix might be to make LedgerMetadata immutable since it is rarely
> updated.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
