I believe we have committed these patches to trunk, but not for branch 4.2. We would need to do it.
Calling these API changes bugfixes is not exactly what I call orthodox, but fine, we can do it if it makes everyone happy. Whitney, Could you confirm that this is what you'd like us to do? -Flavio On May 24, 2013, at 7:06 PM, Ivan Kelly <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 04:59:32PM -0400, Whitney Sorenson wrote: >> I think having a release sooner than late July would be great (esp. since I >> don't really care about security, but some of the other work that has been >> done would be great to have.) > I assume you're talking about the API changes > (BookKeeperAdmin#listLedgers() & BookKeeper#isClosed(long))? > > If it's just this, then I think we could possibly do a spot release as > 4.2.2. The minor version releases should only really be for > bugfix releases, these changes are more like a bugfix than a > feature. They don't change anything internal to bookkeeper. Really > they just expose something that wasn't exposed previously. > > I'd feel more comfortable pushing it out as 4.2.2 rather than > 4.3.0. The second number really should call for some meatier changes. > > -Ivan
