[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13675608#comment-13675608 ]
Sijie Guo commented on BOOKKEEPER-614: -------------------------------------- I think [~i0exception] already has some interfaces defined BOOKKEEPER-398. Why not use it? It looks like the interface would introduce big differences comparing BOOKKEEPER-398, it might make trouble for us to corporate with the community. another point is that how this interface interact with JMX and be compatible with old versions? > Generic stats interface, which multiple providers can be plugged into > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: BOOKKEEPER-614 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-614 > Project: Bookkeeper > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Ivan Kelly > Assignee: Ivan Kelly > Fix For: 4.3.0 > > Attachments: > 0001-BOOKKEEPER-614-Generic-stats-interface-which-multipl.patch > > > Currently we collect stats though JMX. Adding a new stat to JMX is > cumbersome, and reading the stats out of JMX is painful if you're not on the > same machine. As a consequence, we aren't measuring a fraction of the stuff > we should be. > There are a couple of nice stats packages out there, such as twitter-stats[1] > and codahale metrics[2], which would make collection of stats much easier. > This JIRA is to provide a generic interface, which a metrics backend can be > plugged into. > [1] > https://github.com/twitter/commons/tree/master/src/java/com/twitter/common/stats > [2] http://metrics.codahale.com/ -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira