[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14177019#comment-14177019
]
Ivan Kelly commented on BOOKKEEPER-792:
---------------------------------------
I didn't. Currently in the middle of a massive rebase, so don't want to switch
branches right now to check. In any case, though, submitting to subversion
would lose the rename. Perhaps it would be better to wait until we've moved to
git (as part of TLP) to do this.
> Split bookkeeper client into a separate maven module
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BOOKKEEPER-792
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-792
> Project: Bookkeeper
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Ivan Kelly
> Assignee: Ivan Kelly
> Fix For: 4.4.0
>
> Attachments: 0001-Split-the-bookkeeper-client-from-the-server.patch,
> 0001-Split-the-bookkeeper-client-from-the-server.patch,
> 0001-Split-the-bookkeeper-client-from-the-server.patch
>
>
> Right now, to include bookkeeper as a dependency, you need to include
> org.apache.bookkeeper:bookkeeper-server
> This pulls in all the bookkeeper-server code, and all the server dependencies
> as well as the client. The server dependencies are larger than the client
> dependencies. For one thing, it pulls in jna and log4j which should never be
> pulled in from the client.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
