troy d. straszheim wrote: > The test that causes this is just a program with a main() routine... It > seems like it should use boost.test, and boost.test should be > responsible for making these dialog-suppressing calls. (Does that sound > like it makes sense?)
1. I'm reluctant to recommend that any program use Boost.Test until its documentation is made to correspond to its actual interface. 2. You'd better ask Gennadiy what makes sense for Boost.Test; I don't understand the rationale by which it gets developed 3. Maybe we could have an option in boost/detail/lightweight_test, or simply a separate header called boost/detail/regression.hpp that includes something that does this. Maybe the old "dynamically-initialized static member of a template" trick makes sense here. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com _______________________________________________ Boost-cmake mailing list Boost-cmake@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-cmake
