Denis ARNAUD wrote:
2009/10/28 Denis ARNAUD <denis.arnaud_bo...@m4x.org <mailto:denis.arnaud_bo...@m4x.org>>[...] Would it be possible to have the option, with CMake build, to use a more conventional soname, so that Linux distribution packagers (Debianers and RPM-based packagers such as me, for instance) be happy (i.e., have less extra code to write)?Last year, Steve Robbins wrote <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-boost-devel/2008-November/001611.html> that the Boost-CMake group could maybe add such option in the future (i.e., now).
So, like this (?): % ls -l build/lib total 1352 libboost_iostreams-mt-d.a libboost_iostreams-mt-d.so -> libboost_iostreams-mt-d.so.1.41* libboost_iostreams-mt-d.so.1.41 -> libboost_iostreams-mt-d.so.1.41.0* libboost_iostreams-mt-d.so.1.41.0* libboost_iostreams-mt.a libboost_iostreams-mt.so -> libboost_iostreams-mt.so.1.41* libboost_iostreams-mt.so.1.41 -> libboost_iostreams-mt.so.1.41.0* libboost_iostreams-mt.so.1.41.0* -t _______________________________________________ Boost-cmake mailing list Boost-cmake@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-cmake
