On 7/11/07, John Maddock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David Abrahams wrote: > > ...unless the code examples in our documentation are tested, they > > will be wrong...
100% agree. > > For those willing to use RestructuredText, there is LitRe, in the > > tools subdirectory of the Boost tree. Aleksey and I used that for our > > book and Daniel and I used it for the Boost.Parameter docs. > > http://lists.boost.org/boost-testing/2005/03/0493.php > > You can already use quickbook to import your code examples (AKA "reverse > literate programming"), so it is possible to have only one version of an > example, and to have it tested as well as in the docs, albeit not in the way > you invision. > > It would still make a great feature though.. Indeed. For small snippets it is somewhat unnatural to keep them separate from the qbk source. Best regards Matias ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Boost-docs mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe and other administrative requests: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
