On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Jon Kalb <[email protected]> wrote: > If we offered a non-exclusive Video Sponsorship, here is how it would > work. If you just want to be a Video Sponsor you pay X (the non-exclusive > rate) and you may be the only one. But if someone else also wants, they can > pay X as well. Each video will have two pre-rolls with each coming first on > half the videos. If you want to be the exclusive Video Sponsor you pay Y > (the exclusive Video Sponsorship rate) and we’ll accept no other Video > Sponsors. Once we accept a Video Sponsor, the exclusive Video Sponsorship > is no longer available (except as an upgrade to the existing Video Sponsor).
If it is non-exclusive, does the sponsor get a say in which talks they want their pre-roll on? I'm not saying they should or shouldn't; rather, we have to come up with a way that is fair. -- Nevin ":-)" Liber <mailto:[email protected]> +1-847-691-1404 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Boost Steering Committee" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
