On 10/23/17 9:09 AM, Rene Rivera wrote:
As per request from various SC members here are the some possible
bylaws, or perhaps just rules, to consider for better structuring the
operation of the SC. Do with them as you please.
<http://bit.ly/2hI22DN>
I would be interesting to have pointer to the current bylaws if there
are any.
I cursory examination there is one big thing. The distinction of
"library authors" is with special powers/privileges, is a non-starter as
far as I'm concerned. Of course library authors are important, but
we're not the only important constituency. This kind of thing leaves
users, tool developers, library distributors, with the idea that they
don't count. It would start boost on the death spiral to a perfect
implementation which very few people actually uses.
Robert Ramey
--
The Boost Steering Committee webpage:
https://sites.google.com/a/boost.org/steering/
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Boost Steering Committee" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/boost-steering.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/boost-steering/osl8g0%2446s%241%40blaine.gmane.org.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
