I believe Zach Laine's library is the heir apparent -- it was accepted, but isn't in boost just yet. He describes some of the issues here:
https://tzlaine.github.io/stl_interfaces/doc/html/boost_stlinterfaces/this_library_s_relationship_to_boost_iterator.html Jeff On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 2:00 PM Mateusz Loskot via Boost-users < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > This is a bit theoretical question, but I'd like to collect some opinions. > > Considering sequence of C++ versions, around where, if at all, > boost::iterator_facade shines less and becomes less relevant? > > In other words: > - If you had to implement iterators in C++11, would you use it? > - If you had to implement iterators in C++17, would you use it? > > Has anyone observed performance issues when using iterator_facade? > > Best regards, > -- > Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net > _______________________________________________ > Boost-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users >
_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
