thanks. it's learning journey anyway. ________________________________ From: Boost-users <[email protected]> on behalf of Richard Hodges via Boost-users <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2021 5:30 AM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Cc: Richard Hodges <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Boost-users] UUID
On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 at 07:27, Ming Cheng via Boost-users <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Now let's focus on 64-bit UUID. There is no such thing. Can do by boost? Therefore no. As I mentioned before, let me hold responsible for mis-usage. you experience people just help. ________________________________ From: Boost-users <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Gavin Lambert via Boost-users <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2021 3:07 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: Gavin Lambert <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [Boost-users] UUID On 29/07/2021 9:16 am, chengm349 wrote: > so boost uuid can't support compromised uuid needs? Don't make something look like a uuid if it's not actually a uuid. That road leads to pain and torment. Go back to the customer and clarify the requirement, it's likely they can be persuaded to do things better. _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users -- Richard Hodges [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> office: +44 2032 898 513 home: +376 861 195 mobile: +376 380 212
_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
