I notice that our type_traits headers still define:
typedef char yes_type;
typedef double no_type;
Which is non-portable w.r.t. sizeof() differences. Is there any reason
we can't change no_type to
char (&)[2]
or
struct { char[2] x; } // if it needs to be constructed
?
--
David Abrahams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
