"Paul Mensonides" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:001601c286c9$64eedf40$6401a8c0@;c161550b... [about a C++ preprocessor] > This one I'd like to see, but it might be too easy. There isn't much to > Cpp.
Explain this to the MSVC and MWCW folks. They both got it wrong. That's the main reason for which I'd like an open-source, good quality C++ preprocessor. And by the way, I understand some preprocessors take a pathologically long time with the Preprocessor Library (something I'm too scared to look at) so if Boost had a preprocessor offering, that would come in handily. Then, users could combine the Boost preprocessor with their compiler. Andrei _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
