> I just compared allocation speed for std::allocator and > boost::fast_pool_allocator: > > VC7: > boost::fast_pool_allocator is 8.5 times faster. > > BCC32 5.5.1 : > boost::fast_pool_allocator is 1.25 times faster. > > Can anybody shed light on why fast_pool_allocator benefit ratio is so different > for different compilers ?
C++ Builder 6 uses STLport, which has a pool based allocator by default anyway... John Maddock http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/john_maddock/index.htm _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
