Vahan Margaryan wrote:
As pointed out by Robert, the user-supplied string id could be made optional. For the lazy user we might imagine a default value obtained in some programmatic way, for example a possibly pre-processed type_info::name().Eric Woodruff wrote:type_info is not portable in the slightest.I realize that. I just pointed out that it's not so convenient to have user-supplied string ids because of the template classes.
Alberto Barbati
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
