From: "Gennadiy Rozental" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Its clear you spend a lot of time on this. Your attention to end perception of detail is extraordinary. Also your critisms are phrased in a way that proposes and contrasts the alternative - a very useful feature.
So many of these I have no problem with - except maybe with the time do actually do work. Things like breaking up the stl.hpp, etc are non-controversial. A few of the bugs have already been fixed and some are reported here for the first time. These posts have long convinced me that the documentation needs to be corrected and amplified in certain aspects. One thing interests me right away. Is there anyway that void_cast.* would be interesting as a separate boost object. I don't have much emotional capitol invested in this and would be happy to split it off right away and/or replace with your own implementation somewhere else in boost. I have no idea whether it has any utility outside of this context. Generally I like this post very much. There are several things I will disagree with but I will require more time to respond with attention it deserves. Robert Ramey _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
