Hamish, On 24 Nov 2002 23:23:27 +0000, Hamish Mackenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > is_set -> count (I'm not fussed about this one) > > Not sure about "count", how about something like "active" > Yes, or "contains"? or "find". Having looked at set maybe count is better, but that suggests an integer return value. mm.
> > > Also for library implementors I think we need > > > update_width() > > > To be called after the OS has updated the fd_set > > > > I saw this in ACE, but couldn't quite work out what it > > was doing? > > I have not looked at the code but from what I read in C++NP it scans > fd_set for the highest file_descriptor. I am still thinking that this is detail that is obviated by having iterators provided by the class itself. > I have attached the > implementation of file_descriptor_set I have been using in my code > recently. Is there really any difference except in the name? The use of friend is for select is certainly worth thinking about. I'll change the name to file_descriptor_set. The reason I had left it as socket_set was that I was not sure how to mix SOCKET and files on windows - but htat looks to be easy from your code.... Hugo _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost