Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "David B. Held" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Does this have any merit whatsoever?
> |
> | template <typename T, typename U>
> | T* dangerous_cast(U* p)
> | {
> | return static_cast<T*>(static_cast<void*>(p));
> | }
>
> Is it any different from reinterpret_cast<T*>(p) ?
It might be, depending on your compiler. The behavior of
reinterpret_cast<T*> is implementation-defined.
--
David Abrahams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
