From: "David Abrahams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > "John Maddock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> If this fails to compile, we may need to add a dummy "return 0;" at > >> the end. I know of two compilers which act this way: Metrowerks and > >> HP. > > > > What do you want to call it? > > I'm not happy with it, but... > > BOOST_NO_NON_RETURN_PATH_COMPREHENSION is the best I could come up > with :(
What about having BOOST_UNREACHABLE_RETURN(0) or BOOST_UNREACHABLE_RETURN("") I think we need to "return" values for types other than int. Mark _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost