"David B. Held" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...]
| 2) Under what circumstances is the following equivalent to the | above: | | reinterpret_cast<T*>(p); One of the issues that distinguishly arose during this disucssion is whether reinterpret_cast<void*>(ptr) is well-formed. (My compilers don't reject it). If it is well-formed, is-it equivalent to static_cast<void*>(ptr)? Is reinterpret_cast<char*>(ptr) equivalent to reinterpret_cast<void*>(ptr)? Does reinterpret_cast<char*>(ptr) == static_cast<void*>(ptr) hold? What does 5.2.10/1 really mean? | | A) Always | B) Implementation-defined | C) Never | D) Other | | Is that a reasonable statement of the problem? I think it is a good start. -- Gaby _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
