Toon Knapen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Long time ago I inquired if it would be a good idea to provide STL extensions
> in boost that are not implemented by all STL's. IIRC David A responded that
> boost/compatibility was intended for this.
That sort of surprises me. I think they should go in boost, for sure,
but I thought the compatibility library was about fixing broken
std library implementations. This is really Ralf's bailiwick, though.
Ralf?
--
David Abrahams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
