On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, David Abrahams wrote: > That's awfully verbose, though. And it would need a "BOOST_" prefix, > making it more verbose still. > > Given that the meaning of BOOST_WORKAROUND is already non-transparent, > you need to read the documentation to understand it. I think it'd be > best to simply document the "|" convention there.
I agree, I considered this later that night, after I wrote the message. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
