From: "Fernando Cacciola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > You should consider providing operator<<(std::ostream&, optional), too. > > > Interesting... > The idea is that if the optional is uninitialized, it outputs something like > "[NULL]", > else forwards to T::operator <<(), right? > > I agree it is usefull, but I'm not sure if it should be provided by the > library itself.
If you have a conversion to a "member pointer bool", you have to provide a reasonable operator<<, too, otherwise the standard operator<<(ostream&, bool) is used. :-) _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
