----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Dimov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Boost mailing list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 5:35 PM Subject: Re: [boost] Formal review: Optional library
> From: "Peter Dimov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Oops, > > > Yes it will. :-) > > > > optional<T> m; > > should have been > > optional<T> m(t); > > > foo(m, m); // comparison inside yields false > > Nop... :-) it compares true because get_pointer(x)==get_poiner(x) is true for any x, whether initialized or not. In fact, this is the very reason why I choosen this definition. It matches pointer aliasing. Fernando Cacciola _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
