On Sat, 14 Dec 2002 10:49:30 -0500, David Abrahams
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Someone expressed concern about using the PP lib in the definition of
>this macro, because, after all, the PP lib itself might want to use
>it. I presume you're not worried about that, though.
Sorry to ruin your fun but I'm still with Einstein here (all this
stuff amuses me as well, just I wouldn't use it in this situation)
a)
// to be changed Borland
#define ERROR(cond) (1 / (cond? 0:1))
#define WORKAROUND_WITH_CHECK(symbol, test) ( \
((symbol) != 0) \
&& ERROR(DETECT_OUTDATED && !((symbol) test)) \
)
b)
#define ERROR(cond) (1 / (cond? 0:1))
#define WORKAROUND_WITH_CHECK(symbol, version) ( \
((symbol) != 0) \
&& ERROR(DETECT_OUTDATED && !((symbol) <= version)) \
)
Genny.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
