Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
> David A. Greene wrote:
> > Thanks for considering this. I think it will be quite
> > useful. I look forward to seeing what you come up with!
>
> Well, it turned out to be a little bit more complicated than
> I had foreseen, so it's not there yet. Please stay tuned!
Okay, from this moment MPL's lambda supports "reduced" metafunction form
directly (if detected):
template< typename T > struct her
{
// no 'type' member!
};
typedef lambda< her<_> >::type f;
typedef apply<f,int>::type t;
BOOST_MPL_ASSERT_IS_SAME(t, her<int>);
The "ordinary" metafunctions work as before.
Enjoy!
Aleksey
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
