> I have two questions about the use of the typename-keyword when using
> template-parameter dependent types.
>
> 1. Consider the following code:
>
> template< class T >
> {
> typedef typename A::foo t;
> };
>
> IIRC there are some compilers that only compile the above without the
> typename keyword? Is that correct (I only have the Intel and GCC compilers
> at hand, so I can't check)
Boost code always uses the typename: there are no current compilers that
don't support it IMO.
> 2. Can the BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT macro deal with the following?
>
> template< class T >
> {
> BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT( typename T::foo, bar = T::value );
> };
>
> i.e. the extra typename keyword?
Um I hope so, but why not typedef the typename first which removes the
problem?
John Maddock
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/john_maddock/index.htm
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
