Alisdair Meredith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > David Abrahams wrote: > >> ...although now the only expected failure tests we have left are >> compile-fail. So I don't know what to do with the others. > > Could we introduce a third result. Pass and fail we know, 'error' would > the test could not actually be run. This would reflect a compile fail > for link/runtime tests, missing/corrupt files for compile tests (perhaps > due to CVS corruption) and probably a couple more corner cases I haven't > thought about yet.
I'm afraid implementing this feature looks very difficult to me. Patches welcome, of course! -- David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.boost-consulting.com Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost