"Vesa Karvonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > David Abrahams: >>Paul Mensonides: >> > The semantic change is that 'x' must not be a function-like macro. What do >> > you think? >> >>I think that rules out most of the use-cases Vesa was interested in >>addressing with this :( > > Well, it does rule out some use-cases, and it is not ideal to have such limitations, >but it should > still be useful for testing whether an object-like macro, such as an include guard, >or a config > macro, has been defined. I think that there are many uses for the > macro.
How can you use a macro which only tells you if a function-like macro is defined to tell you if an object-like macro is defined? If we could do that, couldn't you implement your original intended semantics? -- David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.boost-consulting.com Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost