>From: "Terje Slettebų" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hm. Given that BCB 6.0 gives an error on another part of the test program (the call f(str,str) is reported as ambiguous), and I need to check for that compiler, as well, maybe one could have a more general configuration macro, like BOOST_FUNCTION_TEMPLATE_PARTIAL_ORDERING_BUG. (Intel C++ and BCB 6.0 has partial ordering in general, but don't handle more complex cases, such as the example below.) This would avoid a proliferation of compiler-specific macros.
> #include <string> > > template<class Result,class T> > void f(Result,T) {} > > template<class Result,class CharType,class CharTraits,class Allocator> > void f(Result,std::basic_string<CharType,CharTraits,Allocator>) {} > > template<class CharType,class CharTraits,class Allocator,class Source> > void f(std::basic_string<CharType,CharTraits,Allocator>,Source) {} > > void f(std::string,std::string) {} // Error here > > int main() > { > int i; > std::string str; > > f(i,i); > f(str,i); > f(i,str); > f(str,str); > } Regards, Terje _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost