>From: "David B. Held" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> "Paul Mensonides" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> 000901c2b823$1e7f4aa0$8c00a8c0@c161550b">news:000901c2b823$1e7f4aa0$8c00a8c0@c161550b...
> From: "Terje Slettebų" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > [...]
> > BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT((\
> >   boost::is_same<T, bool>::value ||\
> >   boost::is_same<T, int>::value ||\
> >   boost::is_same<T, double>::value ||\
> >   boost::is_same<T, std::string>::value ));
>
> And this is still bulkier and less elegant than the two-line MPL solution.
> ;)

I agree. I had actually missed Dave Abrahams (lastname used, as there's a
lot of Dave's here. :) ) solution, but I found it, now. I think was an
elegant way of doing it.

And, yeah, I didn't think of that you don't need backslashes when _calling_
a macro, only when defining it.


Regards,

Terje

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Reply via email to