Matthias Troyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Saturday, January 18, 2003, at 12:55 PM, John Maddock wrote: >> If you can test and supply patches they would be much >> appreciated, come to >> that, I don't suppose you would like to volunteer to regularly run the >> regression tests on that platform would you (no problem if you can't >> though)? Testing on Cray would be useful if only >> because the architecture >> is so different from the usual 32-bit platforms we test on. > > I tried to run the regression test but the first > problem I encountered is that jam does not seem to work > on a Cray machine: > > athos:> sh ./build.sh cc > ### > ### Using 'cc' toolset. > ### > rm -rf bootstrap.cc > mkdir bootstrap.cc > cc -o bootstrap.cc/jam0 command.c compile.c execnt.c > execunix.c execvms.c expand.c filent.c fileos2.c > fileunix.c filevms.c glob.c hash.c hdrmacro.c headers.c > jam.c jambase.c jamgram.c lists.c make.c make1.c > newstr.c option.c parse.c pathunix.c pathvms.c regexp.c > rules.c scan.c search.c subst.c timestamp.c variable.c > modules.c strings.c filesys.c builtins.c pwd.c > ./bootstrap.cc/jam0 -f build.jam --toolset=cc --toolset-root= > ./build.sh[3]: 48150 Floating exception(coredump)
One other thing worth checking if you can't get a stack trace easily: ./bootstrap.cc/jam0 -d12 You may get enough useful output for us to track down the problem. -- David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.boost-consulting.com Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost