I agree with this - intervals seem more numeric to me - though where that leaves constants (especially interval constants) I am less clear.
Paul PS I think it is time to have another Formal Review of Math Constants. Please can the Review Wizard schedule this? > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Beman Dawes > Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 6:22 PM > To: Boost mailing list; Boost mailing list > Subject: Re: [boost] Interval library merge > > > At 09:55 AM 1/20/2003, David Abrahams wrote: > > >Guillaume Melquiond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> but before that, something must be decided: where to put the > >> library? > >> > >> This question was already discussed on this mailing-list some times > ago, > >> but no clear answer was given at that time. The library directory is > >> actually directly under boost. To avoid cluttering the root, it would > >> probably be better to put it somewhere else; for example, boost/math or > >> boost/numeric. Unfortunately, the library has some good reasons to be > >> put > >> in each of these directories. So I suggest it is put in boost/numeric > >> (heads or tails). > >> > >> Subsidiary question: should the namespace tree follow the directory > tree? > >> I think it should; but since I will need a few hours to correct the > whole > >> source and documentation (it isn't as easy as changing the #include at > >> the top of the files), I prefer to ask beforehand. > > I don't have a strong opinion, but mildly favor boost/numeric with > namespace tree following directory tree. > > --Beman > > > _______________________________________________ > Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost > _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
