From: "Howard Hinnant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Imho, standardized move syntax/semantics is very close to the top of > important issues for C++. I guess that's why I'm pushing for current > smart pointers to get "the right syntax" for move semantics.
But can they get the right syntax without &&? With &&, it's trivial. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
