"David Abrahams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > [...] > That's called boost::compressed_pair.
Right. The generality of compressed_pair kept me from seeing that rather obvious fact. > [...] > There is no such thing as empty member optimization. Hmm...that's odd, because bcc includes a switch to turn it on. Given how poor it is at most optimization, I assumed that surely this was a standard thing. Guess not. > > [...] > > I mean, the optimally_inherit eliminates the empty bases, and yet > > there is size bloat. So VC++ makes the class bigger for some > > other reason than that it has empty bases. I will try to write some > > tests to see why that is, or at least how. > > I repeat, I bet it's MI-related. The proof of the pudding is in the eating. Dave _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
