On Tue, 04 Feb 2003 00:23:26 +0100, Paul Mensonides wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Daniel Frey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> template< class C, typename T > struct is_member_function_pointer< T
>> C::* >
> { enum { value = is_function< T >::value }; };
>> template< class C, typename T > struct is_member_function_pointer< T
>> C::*
> const > { enum { value = is_function< T >::value }; };
>> template< class C, typename T > struct is_member_function_pointer< T
>> C::*
> volatile > { enum { value = is_function< T >::value }; };
>> template< class C, typename T > struct is_member_function_pointer< T
>> C::*
> const volatile > { enum { value = is_function< T >::value }; };
>
> Whoa, sorry Daniel, I missed this part, which is almost exactly the same
> as my post.
And which is exactly the kind of type-deduction that the GCC fails to do
- which is why I needed to create the slightly more complex version to tame
both compilers at the same time :)
Regards, Daniel
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
