Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
"Joel de Guzman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

| Hi,
| | I'm not sure if you are aware of this but g++ 2.95.3 cannot
| handle the casts:
| | g++ 2.95.3 [no STLport]
| C:/dev/boost/boost/mpl/integral_c.hpp:67: sorry, not implemented: `static_cast_expr' not supported
| by dump_expr

This means that the part of GCC-2.95.x compiler responsible for
pretty-printing "static_cast_expr" was not taught to do its homework.
First of all, this looks like a major problem: looking at
regressiong tests result for linux, I see that filesystem tests fail for
that reason, and some other too -- 53% of tests fail.

Further, I can't understand the following part of regression logs:

operations_test / gcc
[snip]
/opt/gcc2/bin//g++ -c -Wall -ftemplate-depth-100 -g -O0 -fno-inline -I"../libs/filesystem/test" -I "/home/boost/boost-regress/boost" -o "../libs/filesystem/test/bin/operations_test.test/gcc/debug/runtime-link-dynamic/operations_test.o" "/home/boost/boost-regress/boost/libs/filesystem/test/operations_test.cpp"

operations_test / gcc2953
[snip]

Compiler output:
[snip]
/opt/gcc2/bin//g++ -c -Wall -ftemplate-depth-100 -g -O0 -fno-inline -I"../libs/filesystem/test" -I "/home/boost/boost-regress/boost" -o "../libs/filesystem/test/bin/operations_test.test/gcc2953/debug/runtime-link-dynamic/operations_test.o" "/home/boost/boost-regress/boost/libs/filesystem/test/operations_test.cpp"

Is the same compiler invoked in both cases? This is very likely, because I've
just build filesystem library with gcc3.2/Boost.Build2 without problems.

BTW, Gabriel, why you say about "pretty-printing"? I though no
RTL is pretty printed in default gcc settings...

- Volodya

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost


Reply via email to