On Thursday, February 06, 2003 8:10 AM [GMT+1=CET], David Bradley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wonder if there may have been issues or holes in the policy based > pointer implementation that I worked on years ago that we didn't > encounter or think about at the time. I'm trying to figure out where the > wasted space would be in a policy based design. Most compilers don't optimize away the space for empty base classes in a multiple inheritance scenario. See http://www.boost.org/libs/utility/operators.htm#chaining -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
