Jon Kalb wrote: [...]
> I'm afraid that I don't see your point. How is this relevant? It will prevent you to encounter this situation (if peak_of() is used only with smart_ptr<>s). peak_of() won't have to deal with it. It would also be possible to assert the parameter of peak_of() is valid, but only at run-time (less efficient). Philippe _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
