[2003-02-13] Beman Dawes wrote: >At 11:53 AM 2/13/2003, Gennadiy Rozental wrote: > > >> > Hi, everybody > >> > > >> > Today I committed second revision to Boost.Test library. > >> > >> Wow, is that a good idea one day before we branch for release? > > > >I should have done it week ago, but was really sick. Anyway, It does not > >contain anything that should break backward compartibility. > >However, problems with Boost.Test broke a lot of Metrowerks tests. > >--Beman > >PS: I started the Win32 tests running this morning, and then left right >away for a meeting. > >When I got back, random_test had been looping for six hours. Sigh. I don't >know that's related. > >I'll run the Win32 tests several times a day as long as lots of changes are >being checked in.
I had similar problems with the OpenBSD tests. It ran last night and I woke up to it still hung, using 99% CPU, in one test (thread/test_condition). Killed it and a few others after that to make it complete. Since this is release time I'll try and run the tests more frequently, twice a day at least, until things get better. -- grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- 102708583@icq _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
