"Eric Friedman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message b2uflv$86s$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:b2uflv$86s$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > [...] > const T& r = ...; > r.~T(); > > Even if my understanding is correct though, it may be best for destroyer > to take a non-const reference to avoid confusion.
Comeau says it's ok, so I'd just leave it as is. It does seem peculiar to me, though. Dave _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
